WELCOME TO LEGAL HELP LAW
You are welcome once, your own website, today we will talk about section 3 and 4 of the Indian evidence Act. What is it? It gives citizens rights to cones.
What is section 6 of evidence act. -
6. Relevancy of facts forming part of same transaction. ––
Facts which, though not in issue, are so
connected with a fact in issue as to form part of the same transaction, are relevant, whether they occurred
at the same time and place or at different times and places.
Illustrations
(a) A is accused of the murder of B by beating him. Whatever was said or done by A or B or the by-standers at
the beating, or so shortly before or after it as to form part of the transaction, is a relevant fact.
(b) A is accused of waging war against the [Government of India] by taking part in an armed insurrection in
which property is destroyed, troops are attacked and gaols are broken open. The occurrence of these facts is relevant,
as forming part of the general transaction, though A may not have been present at all of them.
(c) A sues B for a libel contained in a letter forming part of a correspondence. Letters between the parties
relating to the subject out of which the libel arose, and forming part of the correspondence in which it is contained,
are relevant facts, though they do not contain the libel itself.
(d) The question is, whether certain goods ordered from B were delivered to A. The goods were delivered to
several intermediate persons successively. Each delivery is a relevant fact.
explantion -
6. (quality of being connected or related to something) of facts forming part of same transaction. --
Facts which, though not in issue, are so connected with a fact in issue as to form part of the same transaction, are (clearly connected or related), whether they happened at the same time and place or at different times and places.
Drawings/pictures
(a) A is (charged with a crime) of the murder of B by beating him. Whatever was said or done by A or B or the by-standers at the beating, or so shortly before or after it as to form part of the transaction, is a (clearly connected or related) fact.
(b) A is (charged with a crime) of fighting war against the [Government of India] by taking part in an armed huge riot in which property is destroyed, troops are attacked and gaols are broken open. The event of these facts is (clearly connected or related), as forming part of the general transaction, though A may not have been present at all of them.
(c) A sues B for a written lies contained in a letter forming part of a back-and-forth writing. Letters between the parties relating to the subject out of which the written lies rose up, and forming part of the back-and-forth writing in which it is contained, are (clearly connected or related) facts, though they do not contain the written lies itself.
(d) The question is, whether certain products (that are bought and sold) ordered from B were delivered to A. The products (that are bought and sold) were delivered to (more than two, but not a lot of) (middle-position) people (one after the other). Each delivery is a (clearly connected or related) fact.
Drawings/pictures
(a) A is tried for the murder of B by beating him with a club with the plan/purpose of causing his death. At A's trial the following facts are in issue: --
A's beating B with the club;
A's causing B's death by such beating;
A's plan/purpose to cause B's death.
(b) A romantic interest does not bring with him, and have in readiness for production at the first hearing of the case, a bond on which he relies. This section does not enable him to produce the bond or prove its contents at a later stage of the (series of events), otherwise than (going along with/obeying) the conditions prescribed by the Code of Civil Procedure.
Facts which, though not in issue, are so connected with a fact in issue as to form part of the same transaction, are (clearly connected or related), whether they happened at the same time and place or at different times and places.
Drawings/pictures
(a) A is (charged with a crime) of the murder of B by beating him. Whatever was said or done by A or B or the by-standers at the beating, or so shortly before or after it as to form part of the transaction, is a (clearly connected or related) fact.
(b) A is (charged with a crime) of fighting war against the [Government of India] by taking part in an armed huge riot in which property is destroyed, troops are attacked and gaols are broken open. The event of these facts is (clearly connected or related), as forming part of the general transaction, though A may not have been present at all of them.
(c) A sues B for a written lies contained in a letter forming part of a back-and-forth writing. Letters between the parties relating to the subject out of which the written lies rose up, and forming part of the back-and-forth writing in which it is contained, are (clearly connected or related) facts, though they do not contain the written lies itself.
(d) The question is, whether certain products (that are bought and sold) ordered from B were delivered to A. The products (that are bought and sold) were delivered to (more than two, but not a lot of) (middle-position) people (one after the other). Each delivery is a (clearly connected or related) fact.
Drawings/pictures
(a) A is tried for the murder of B by beating him with a club with the plan/purpose of causing his death. At A's trial the following facts are in issue: --
A's beating B with the club;
A's causing B's death by such beating;
A's plan/purpose to cause B's death.
(b) A romantic interest does not bring with him, and have in readiness for production at the first hearing of the case, a bond on which he relies. This section does not enable him to produce the bond or prove its contents at a later stage of the (series of events), otherwise than (going along with/obeying) the conditions prescribed by the Code of Civil Procedure.
If you read all section of indian evidence act 1872 than you click here sharimllb for laern to all section indian evidence act 1872 with explation.
0 Comments